ncor.buffalo.edu
NCOR - People
http://ncor.buffalo.edu/people.php
NCOR: National Center for Ontological Research. Quick start: For Researchers. NCOR-affilated ontologists are involved in collaborative ventures with many leading national and international institutions. Many of these ontologists are centered at the University at Buffalo. They have received major funding for ontology-related projects from the NSF, NIH, US and Canadian defense agencies and defense industries, and from the European Union. 1 Located in Buffalo. Research in theoretical and applied ontology.
militaryontology.com
Randall Dipert's Biography - Military Ontology
http://www.militaryontology.com/randall-diperts-biography.html
Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Randall R. Dipert. CS Peirce Professor of American Philosophy. Buffalo, NY 14260-4150. Website: http:/ www.dipert.org. Areas of Specialization:Ontology, Ethics of War especially cyberwarfare, Logic (especially of relations), C.S. Peirce. Ldquo;A Comparison of the Philosophies of Peirce and Wittgenstein” (Wittgenstein Symposium 2011). The Ethics of Cyberwarfare,". Journal of Military Ethics. Artifacts, Art Works, and Agency" (Temple University Press, 1993). Http:/ www.usna...
militaryontology.org
Randall Dipert's Biography - Military Ontology
http://www.militaryontology.org/randall-diperts-biography.html
Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). Randall R. Dipert. CS Peirce Professor of American Philosophy. Buffalo, NY 14260-4150. Website: http:/ www.dipert.org. Areas of Specialization:Ontology, Ethics of War especially cyberwarfare, Logic (especially of relations), C.S. Peirce. Ldquo;A Comparison of the Philosophies of Peirce and Wittgenstein” (Wittgenstein Symposium 2011). The Ethics of Cyberwarfare,". Journal of Military Ethics. Artifacts, Art Works, and Agency" (Temple University Press, 1993). Http:/ www.usna...
davidruaune.wordpress.com
Relationalism | David Ruaune's Blog
https://davidruaune.wordpress.com/2013/02/10/patternism/https://davidruaune.wordpress.com/2010/05/20/patternism
David Ruaune's Blog. Classifying Informal Logical Fallacies. My idea of relation is quite sparse of content. You might say “Ah, but it’s no good talking about relations as such – you have to talk about what type of relation.” This is a reasonable point, so I’d best come clean and say that what I’m talking about is the idea of a fundamental relation, having one type, with its opposite as lack of relation. Of particular interest to me are these two ideas –. For their own sites, see –. The Journal of Philos...