blog.mjplaw.org
November « 2011 « MJP Law Blog
http://blog.mjplaw.org/2011/11
Wednesday, November 16th, 2011. NAAMJP Files Lawsuit in Northern District of CA challenging CA District Court's Local Admission Rules. At 649. Further, the Supreme Court held that the availability of appearance pro hac vice is not a reasonable alternative for an out-of-state attorney who seeks general admission to the District’s Bar. Id. Second, federal law specifically addresses this issue of bar admission on motion. In Supreme Court of Virginia v. Friedman. The complaint also challenges the sacred cow,...
blog.mjplaw.org
August « 2012 « MJP Law Blog
http://blog.mjplaw.org/2012/08
Monday, August 20th, 2012. Arizona Tit-for-Tat Bar Admission Rule Lawsuit Filed. Plaintiffs cite as the legal basis for a uniform reciprocal licensing rule the Supreme Court’s holding that bar admission on motion is a constitutionally Privilege and Immunity, as are the First Amendment rights to petition the court for the redress of grievances, access to the court, speech, and association, which further includes a constitutional right to be free from compelled association. Ninth Circuit Sets Oral Argument...
blog.mjplaw.org
ABA Magazine Article Reciprocity Fight Returns As NAAMJP Lawsuits « MJP Law Blog
http://blog.mjplaw.org/2014/02/12/aba-magazine-article
Wednesday, February 12th, 2014. ABA Magazine Article Reciprocity Fight Returns As NAAMJP Lawsuits. ABA Magazine Article Reciprocity Fight Returns As NAAMJP Lawsuits Press the ABA Advocated Reciprocal Admission on Motion. Http:/ www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/reciprocity fight returns. As lawsuits press the aba-advocated issue/. ABA Magazine Article Reciprocity Fight Returns As NAAMJP Lawsuits. ABA Magazine Article Reciprocity Fight Returns As . Lawsuit challenges DC federal court bar’s recipr.
blog.mjplaw.org
April « 2012 « MJP Law Blog
http://blog.mjplaw.org/2012/04
Friday, April 6th, 2012. It’s Not Just Offshore Legal Outsourcing Anymore. It’s Not Just Offshore Legal Outsourcing Anymore. ABA Magazine Article Reciprocity Fight Returns As . Lawsuit challenges DC federal court bar’s recipr. NAACP Sue Pa. High Court For State Bar Access. Arizona Tit-for-Tat Bar Admission Rule Lawsu. It’s Not Just Offshore Legal Outsourcing Anymore. Access to Justice in California Is Inaccessible Fo. NAAMJP Files Lawsuit in Northern District of CA ch. Website by Consultwebs.com, Inc.
blog.mjplaw.org
May « 2010 « MJP Law Blog
http://blog.mjplaw.org/2010/05
Thursday, May 20th, 2010. NAAMJP files lawsuit challenging U.S. District Court Local Rules in the Ninth Circuit. NAAMJP files lawsuit challenging U.S. District Court “Local” Rules in the Ninth Circuit that Deny General Admission Privileges to Non-Forum State Attorneys. Blye et. al. v Kozinski et. al. c 10-02014. See Pending Litigation Page. NAAMJP files lawsuit challenging U.S. District Court Local Rules in the Ninth Circuit. ABA Magazine Article Reciprocity Fight Returns As .
blog.mjplaw.org
Ninth Circuit Sets Oral Argument in NAAMJP lawsuit challenging Federal District Court Rules that Categorically Deny General Admission Privileges to All Sister- State Attorneys « MJP Law Blog
http://blog.mjplaw.org/2011/09/09/ninth-circuit-sets-oral-argument-in-naamjp-lawsuit-challenging-federal-district-court-rules-that-categorically-deny-general-admission-privileges-to-all-sister-state-attorneys
Friday, September 9th, 2011. Ninth Circuit Sets Oral Argument in NAAMJP lawsuit challenging Federal District Court Rules that Categorically Deny General Admission Privileges to All Sister- State Attorneys. Ninth Circuit Sets Oral Argument in NAAMJP lawsuit challenging Federal District Court Rules that Categorically Deny General Admission Privileges to All Sister- State Attorneys. ABA Magazine Article Reciprocity Fight Returns As . Lawsuit challenges DC federal court bar’s recipr.
blog.mjplaw.org
October « 2011 « MJP Law Blog
http://blog.mjplaw.org/2011/10
Tuesday, October 18th, 2011. October 13: NAAMJP et. al. v California Supreme Court et. al. CV11-5046SBA. Also, see the 360Law.com article at http:/ www.law360.com/. October 13: NAAMJP et. al. v California Supreme Court et. al. CV11-5046SBA. ABA Magazine Article Reciprocity Fight Returns As . Lawsuit challenges DC federal court bar’s recipr. NAACP Sue Pa. High Court For State Bar Access. Arizona Tit-for-Tat Bar Admission Rule Lawsu. It’s Not Just Offshore Legal Outsourcing Anymore. MJP, Multijurisdiction ...
blog.mjplaw.org
September 7, 2011: ABA Ethics 20/20 Commission Recommends All States Adopt Admission on Motion Provisions for All Attorneys with Three Years of Experience « MJP Law Blog
http://blog.mjplaw.org/2011/09/28/september-7-2011-aba-ethics-2020-commission-recommends-all-states-adopt-admission-on-motion-provisions-for-all-attorneys-with-three-years-of-experience
Wednesday, September 28th, 2011. September 7, 2011: ABA Ethics 20/20 Commission Recommends All States Adopt Admission on Motion Provisions for All Attorneys with Three Years of Experience. The Commission asks that the ABA adopt the resolution urging jurisdictions that have not adopted the Model Rule to do so and, in particular, to do so without imposing additional restrictions, such as reciprocity requirements finding. ABA Magazine Article Reciprocity Fight Returns As . October 13: NAAMJP et. al....Ninth...
blog.mjplaw.org
Arizona “Tit-for-Tat” Bar Admission Rule Lawsuit Filed « MJP Law Blog
http://blog.mjplaw.org/2012/08/20/arizona-tit-for-tat-bar-admission-rule-lawsuit-filed
Monday, August 20th, 2012. Arizona Tit-for-Tat Bar Admission Rule Lawsuit Filed. Plaintiffs cite as the legal basis for a uniform reciprocal licensing rule the Supreme Court’s holding that bar admission on motion is a constitutionally Privilege and Immunity, as are the First Amendment rights to petition the court for the redress of grievances, access to the court, speech, and association, which further includes a constitutional right to be free from compelled association. Ninth Circuit Sets Oral Argument...