atthelectern.com
At the Lectern | Summary of May 13, 2015 conference report for civil cases
http://www.atthelectern.com/summary-of-may-13-2015-conference-report-for-civil-cases
Subscribe in a reader. Follow this blog on Twitter. May 15, 2015. Summary of May 13, 2015 conference report for civil cases. The following is our summary of the Supreme Court’s actions on petitions for review in civil cases from the Court’s conference on Wednesday, May 13, 2015. The summary includes those civil cases in which (1) review has been granted, (2) review has been denied but one or more justices has voted for review, or (3) the Court has ordered depublished an opinion of the Court of Appeal.
atthelectern.com
At the Lectern | 6-1 Supreme Court finds no substantial evidence of juvenile’s competency to stand trial
http://www.atthelectern.com/6-1-supreme-court-finds-no-substantial-evidence-of-juveniles-competency-to-stand-trial
Subscribe in a reader. Follow this blog on Twitter. May 18, 2015. 6-1 Supreme Court finds no substantial evidence of juvenile’s competency to stand trial. The Supreme Court today concluded. In re R. V. 8212; the court held that, in a minor’s case, the minor has the burden of rebutting a presumption of competency and that, on appeal, a juvenile court’s determination in a competency proceeding is reviewed deferentially under the substantial evidence test, not de novo. Deferential a substantial evidence tes...
atthelectern.com
At the Lectern | No conference held the week of May 4, 2015
http://www.atthelectern.com/no-conference-held-the-week-of-may-4-2015
Subscribe in a reader. Follow this blog on Twitter. May 6, 2015. No conference held the week of May 4, 2015. The Court is holding no conference this week because it is hearing oral argument in San Francisco. Accordingly, this week no action will be taken on petitions for review and no opinions will be ordered published or depublished. Posted by Brad Pauley at 12:55 PM No Comments. Labels: Weekly conference reports. Mail (will not be published) (required). Laquo; Drug antitrust opinion filing tomorrow.
atthelectern.com
At the Lectern | Trial court erred in not advising defendant of effect of stipulating to a prior conviction. Supreme Court addresses argument not raised in the Court of Appeal.
http://www.atthelectern.com/trial-court-erred-in-not-advising-defendant-of-effect-of-stipulating-to-a-prior-conviction-supreme-court-addresses-argument-not-raised-in-the-court-of-appeal
Subscribe in a reader. Follow this blog on Twitter. May 18, 2015. Trial court erred in not advising defendant of effect of stipulating to a prior conviction. Supreme Court addresses argument not raised in the Court of Appeal. People v. Cross. A unanimous Supreme Court today holds. Of interest to Supreme Court practitioners generally is that the court addressed an argument when it wasn’t required to do so. The Attorney General argued that the. Posted by David Ettinger at 11:30 AM No Comments. The nation's...
atthelectern.com
At the Lectern | Oral argument continuances . . . continued
http://www.atthelectern.com/oral-argument-continuances-continued
Subscribe in a reader. Follow this blog on Twitter. April 17, 2015. Oral argument continuances . . . continued. Another oral argument calendar announced. Another request for a continuance. Two requests, actually. And, although post-argument-scheduling continuance requests have been received favorably of late (see here. Only one of the two requests was granted this time. JR Marketing, L.L.C. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company. But argument will proceed as scheduled in. People v. Grewal. Laquo; Much-wa...
atthelectern.com
At the Lectern | 3-day, 16-argument late-May calendar announced [UPDATED x2]
http://www.atthelectern.com/3-day-16-argument-late-may-calendar-announced
Subscribe in a reader. Follow this blog on Twitter. May 6, 2015. 3-day, 16-argument late-May calendar announced [UPDATED x2]. The Supreme Court today announced its late-May calendar. And it’s a big one. There will be 16 arguments over three days. As mentioned. May is the only double-calendar month and each calendar often includes more arguments than usual. In fact, this month’s total of 25 arguments is almost as much as the previous 5 calendars combined. City of San Diego. People v. Schaeffer. 2003) 29 C...
atthelectern.com
At the Lectern | Too much to ask? Ninth Circuit requests that Supreme Court answer another state law question [UPDATED]
http://www.atthelectern.com/too-much-to-ask-ninth-circuit-requests-that-supreme-court-answer-another-state-law-question
Subscribe in a reader. Follow this blog on Twitter. May 5, 2015. Too much to ask? Ninth Circuit requests that Supreme Court answer another state law question [UPDATED]. For the third time in a little over two months, the Ninth Circuit is asking the Supreme Court to resolve an issue of California law, this time about the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act. In. Davis v. Devanlay Retail Group, Inc. Which the Supreme Court must decide. May 6 Update: The Supreme Court has docketed. This blog is maintained by. Month...
atthelectern.com
At the Lectern | March calendar includes an oldie
http://www.atthelectern.com/march-calendar-includes-an-oldie
Subscribe in a reader. Follow this blog on Twitter. February 6, 2015. March calendar includes an oldie. The Supreme Court today announced. Its March oral argument calendar. As with the court’s February calendar. Which was heard two days ago, there will be three civil cases in the morning and three criminal cases in the afternoon. In re Cipro Cases I and II. On March 3, in San Francisco, the court will hear the following cases (with the issue presented. As stated on the court’s website):. 2013) 570 U....
atthelectern.com
At the Lectern | Weekly conference reports
http://www.atthelectern.com/tag/weekly-conference-reports
Subscribe in a reader. Follow this blog on Twitter. August 18, 2016. Summary of August 10, 2016 conference report for civil cases. The following is our summary of the Supreme Court’s actions on petitions for review in civil cases from the Court’s conference on Wednesday, August 10, 2016. The summary includes those civil cases in which (1) review has been granted, (2) review has been denied but one or more justices has voted for review, or (3) […]. Posted by Brad Pauley at 3:47 PM No Comments. July 8, 2016.
atthelectern.com
At the Lectern | Drug antitrust opinion filing tomorrow
http://www.atthelectern.com/drug-antitrust-opinion-filing-tomorrow
Subscribe in a reader. Follow this blog on Twitter. May 6, 2015. Drug antitrust opinion filing tomorrow. Tomorrow morning, the Supreme Court will file. In re Cipro Cases I and II. Which asks: May a suit under the Cartwright Antitrust Act (Bus. and Prof. Code, 16720 et seq.) be brought to challenge reverse exclusionary payments made by pharmaceutical manufacturers to settle patent litigation with generic drug producers and prolong the life of the patents in question? FTC v Actavis, Inc. Internal Operating...
SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT