specialtylinesadvisory.com
Shareholders' Derivative Suit Misses Target, Still Offers Warning to Directors & Officers | Specialty Lines Advisory Tressler LLP
http://www.specialtylinesadvisory.com/2016/07/14/shareholders-derivative-suit-misses-target-still-offers-warning-directors-officers
Shareholders' Derivative Suit Misses Target, Still Offers Warning to Directors and Officers Specialty Lines Advisory. Shareholders’ Derivative Suit Misses Target, Still Offers Warning to Directors & Officers. Republished from Tressler’s Privacy Risk Report. Where hackers stole private data from an estimated 70 million customers, including credit and debit card information, names, mailing addresses, phone numbers and e-mail addresses. Collier v. Steinhafel et al. In order to assess the allegations, a spec...
specialtylinesadvisory.com
claims made policy Archives | Specialty Lines Advisory Tressler LLP
http://www.specialtylinesadvisory.com/tag/claims-made-policy
Claims made policy Archives Specialty Lines Advisory. Claims-Made Policy’s Late Notice Provision Inapplicable Despite Insured’s Failure to Provide Notice of Lawsuit for More Than Two Years. Despite more than two years elapsing before an insurer first received notice of a lawsuit, the insurer failed to present sufficient evidence under Maryland law to demonstrate a causal link between the late notice and the prejudice it claimed it… Continue Reading →. Subscribe to Specialty Lines Advisory:. February 2, 2...
specialtylinesadvisory.com
Don’t Exclude the Exclusions: Wisconsin Supreme Court Clarifies Duty to Defend Analysis Under Professional Liability Policy | Specialty Lines Advisory Tressler LLP
http://www.specialtylinesadvisory.com/2016/07/06/dont-exclude-exclusions-wisconsin-supreme-court-clarifies-duty-defend-analysis-professional-liability-policy
Don’t Exclude the Exclusions: Wisconsin Supreme Court Clarifies Duty to Defend Analysis Under Professional Liability Policy Specialty Lines Advisory. Don’t Exclude the Exclusions: Wisconsin Supreme Court Clarifies Duty to Defend Analysis Under Professional Liability Policy. Holiday barbecues got off to a roaring start for insurers and insureds when the Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed summary judgment for the insurers and delivered some much-needed clarification concerning the duty to defend in. Decision...
badfaithbulletin.com
Insurer on Hook for $5 Million for Failure to Respond
http://www.badfaithbulletin.com/2016/12/insurer-on-hook-for-5-million-verdict-for-failure-to-discharge-duties-of-good-faith-and-fair-dealing
Insurer on Hook for $5 Million for Failure to Respond in 15 Days to Request for Information or Settlement Demand Results. Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Hedlund. December 7, 2016. December 7, 2016 at 4:35 pm. This decision seems extremely harsh. Especially since the demand was 14 days after the date of accident. Even the DOI allows 40 or 45 days to investigate and evaluate a case. How extreme were the injuries? December 8, 2016 at 12:48 pm. Leave a Reply Cancel reply. Washington ...
badfaithbulletin.com
First Things First – Florida Supreme Court Rules Insured is Entitled to Jury Determination of UM Liability and Damages in Excess of Policy Limits Prior to Litigating First-Party Bad Faith - Bad Faith Bulletin
http://www.badfaithbulletin.com/2016/04/first-things-first-florida-supreme-court-rules-insured-entitled-jury-determination-um-liability-damages-excess-policy-limits-prior-litigating-first-party-bad-faith
First Things First Florida Supreme Court Rules Insured is Entitled to Jury Determination of UM Liability and Damages in Excess of Policy Limits Prior to Litigating First-Party Bad Faith. Fridman v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Illinois. Breach of the duty to settle generally involves evidence of the insured’s exposure in excess of the policy limit. The case illustrates the application of those principles in the first-party UM/UIM context and emphasizes the fact that a delayed tender of the policy’s limits will...
condolawwatch.com
Assessment Collections Archives - Condo Law Watch Tressler LLP
http://www.condolawwatch.com/category/assessment
Assessment Collections Archives - Condo Law Watch. Management and Administrative Fees: Are They Collectable? Oftentimes, management companies will include their own management fees (such as a collection turnover fee or trial witness fee) on the ledger of a delinquent owner’s account when collecting unpaid assessments. As courts are reviewing account ledgers with increasing scrutiny,… Continue Reading →. Amendments to the Condominium and Common Interest Community Ombudsperson Act. Tressler LLP is pleased ...
badfaithbulletin.com
Bad Faith Bulletin - Page 2 of 2 - Extracontractual Claims Liability
http://www.badfaithbulletin.com/page/2
Page 2 of 2. First Things First Florida Supreme Court Rules Insured is Entitled to Jury Determination of UM Liability and Damages in Excess of Policy Limits Prior to Litigating First-Party Bad Faith. Fridman v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Illinois, 2016 WL 743258 (Fla. 2016) arose out of an insured’s demand for the $50,000 uninsured/underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) limit on his auto policy. The insured filed a Civil Remedy Notice pursuant to Florida’s bad… Continue Reading →. In Travelers Property Casualty Co. ...
condolawwatch.com
2016 Brings New Legislative Changes For Condominium Associations - Condo Law Watch Tressler LLP
http://www.condolawwatch.com/2016/01/2016-brings-new-legislative-changes-for-condominium-associations
2016 Brings New Legislative Changes For Condominium Associations - Condo Law Watch. 2016 Brings New Legislative Changes For Condominium Associations. Central to these legislative revisions are those made to the Illinois Condominium Property Act (ICPA), 765 ILCS 605, which governs all condo associations in the State of Illinois. In particular, this year, the following key changes will come into play with respect to all condo associations:. Remote Participation in Board Meetings Allowed Section 18(a)(9)(B).
badfaithbulletin.com
bad faith claims Archives - Bad Faith Bulletin
http://www.badfaithbulletin.com/tag/bad-faith-claims
Insurer’s Conditional Offer to Pay the Policy Limit and Ensure Insured be Released was Not in Bad Faith. In Joseph Shaheen v. Progressive Casualty Ins. Co., the 6th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals determined that the insurer’s conduct did not satisfy the threshold standard for bad faith claims under Kentucky law. In 2005, the insured, while intoxicated, struck… Continue Reading →. Triable Issues Regarding Breach of Contract Call Into Question Elder Abuse. Subscribe to Bad Faith Bulletin:. February 13, 2017.
