probible.net
ProBible.net / Matthew 6:13
http://probible.net/matthew-613
What’s the best way to understand this phrase? 9 Οὕτως οὖν προσεύχεσθε ὑμεῖς Πάτερ ἡμῶν ὁ ἐν τοῖς οὐρανοῖς ἁγιασθήτω τὸ ὄνομά σου, 10 ἐλθέτω ἡ βασιλεία σου, γενηθήτω τὸ θέλημά σου, ὡς ἐν οὐρανῷ καὶ ἐπὶ γῆς 11 τὸν ἄρτον ἡμῶν τὸν ἐπιούσιον δὸς ἡμῖν σήμερον 12 καὶ ἄφες ἡμῖν τὰ ὀφειλήματα ἡμῶν, ὡς καὶ ἡμεῖς ἀφήκαμεν τοῖς ὀφειλέταις ἡμῶν 13 καὶ μὴ εἰσενέγκῃς ἡμᾶς εἰς πειρασμόν, ἀλλὰ ῥῦσαι ἡμᾶς ἀπὸ τοῦ πονηροῦ. Well, yeah, but the text has μὴ εἰσενέγκῃς εἰς …. Or perhaps testing …. ואל תביאני לא לידי חטא.
probible.net
ProBible.net / Ephesians 5:5
http://probible.net/ephesians-55
October 13th, 2013, 7:54 am. Τοῦτο γὰρ ἴστε γινώσκοντες ὅτι πᾶς πόρνος ἢ ἀκάθαρτος ἢ πλεονέκτης, ὅ ἐστιν εἰδωλολάτρης, οὐκ ἔχει κληρονομίαν ἐν τῇ βασιλείᾳ τοῦ Χριστοῦ καὶ θεοῦ. This is an unusual phrase, isn’t it? Ἐν τῇ βασιλείᾳ τοῦ θεοῦ would not have surprised me, the Kingdom of God is a common phrase, the Kingdom of Christ and God much less so – does it occur elsewhere? October 13th, 2013, 2:10 pm. This entry ( permalink. Sunday, October 20, 2013, at 10:16 am. You must be logged in. To post a comment.
probible.net
ProBible.net / The ProBible Project
http://probible.net/page/2
Jeremy Spencer March 8th, 2013, 12:49 pm ἔρχεται οὖν πρὸς Σίμων Πέτρον. λέγει αὐτῷ, Κύριε, σύ μου νίπτεις τοὺς πόδας;I was wondering about the placement of μου prior to νίπτεις. Does the Greek text grammatically move the possessive pronoun forward as a matter of emphasis? Does Peter’s question, and its phrasing in Greek grammar, imply […]. Comments (0) ». Comments (0) ». Is this a case of anacoluthon where the […]. Comments (0) ». Laquo; Older posts. Newer posts ».
probible.net
ProBible.net / Luke 2:33
http://probible.net/luke-233
February 14th, 2013, 6:14 am. Καὶ ἦν ὁ πατὴρ αὐτοῦ καὶ ἡ μήτηρ θαυμάζοντες ἐπὶ τοῖς λαλουμένοις περὶ αὐτοῦ. Why is the main verb ἦν singular when the subject ὁ πατὴρ αὐτοῦ καὶ ἡ μήτηρ and the modifying participle θαυμάζοντες are both plural? Is this a case of anacoluthon where the writer was initially thinking about Joseph’s amazement and changed syntactic horses mid-stream to include Mary as well? February 15th, 2013, 9:20 am. Καὶ ἦν ὁ πατὴρ αὐτοῦ καὶ ἡ μήτηρ θαυμάζοντες ἐπὶ τοῖς λαλουμένοις περὶ αὐτοῦ.
probible.net
ProBible.net / Colossians 1:11
http://probible.net/new-testament-re-colossians-111
I came across this passage in Zerwick's 'Biblical Greek':. Very pertinent quote. A.T. Robertson aptly explains the genitive. (emphasis mine). At every stage one needs to recall the root-idea of the case (genus or kind) and find in that and the environment and history the explanation. A T Robertson, A Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research (Logos Bible Software, 1919), 493 494. Statistics: Posted by Justin Cofer. October 30th, 2013, 5:09 am. This entry ( permalink.
probible.net
ProBible.net / 2 Timothy 3:6-7
http://probible.net/2-timothy-36-7
June 17th, 2013, 12:50 pm. 6 ἑκ τούτων γάρ ἑισιν οἰ ἐνδύνοντες εἰς τὰς οἱκίας καὶ αἱχμαλωτίζοντες γυναικάρια σεσωρευμένα ἁμαρτίαις, ἁγόμενα ἑπιθυμίαις ποικίλιαις, 7 πάντοτε μανθάνοντα καὶ μηδέποτε εἱς ἑπίγνωσιν ἁληθείᾳ ἑλθειν δυνάμενα. (My apologies…I couldn’t get the circumflex over the iota in ἑλθειν for some reason)γυναικάριον, ου τό is diminutive of γυνή with derogatory connotation, but it is neuter…does this open up its meaning to include men acting as foolish little women? June 17th, 2013, 1:38 pm.
probible.net
ProBible.net / James 5:3
http://probible.net/james-53
February 14th, 2013, 9:53 am. How should I read ὡς πῦρ in this passage – like this? 2 ὁ πλοῦτος ὑμῶν σέσηπεν, καὶ τὰ ἱμάτια ὑμῶν σητόβρωτα γέγονεν, 3 ὁ χρυσὸς ὑμῶν καὶ ὁ ἄργυρος κατίωται, καὶ ὁ ἰὸς αὐτῶν εἰς μαρτύριον ὑμῖν ἔσται καὶ φάγεται τὰς σάρκας ὑμῶν ὡς πῦρ ἐθησαυρίσατε ἐν ἐσχάταις ἡμέραις. I see GNTs punctuated both ways. In the first reading, in what sense is storing up things like fire? Ἐξίσταντο δὲ πάντες καὶ διηποροῦντο, ἄλλος πρὸς ἄλλον λέγοντες, τί θέλει τοῦτο εἶναι;. Yes, the syriac treats ...
probible.net
ProBible.net / James 5:1
http://probible.net/james-51
James 5:16 πολὺ ἰσχύει δέησις δικαίου ἐνεργουμένη. February 23rd, 2013, 1:39 pm. Πολὺ ἰσχύει δέησις δικαίου ἐνεργουμένη. What is the force of the participle ἐνεργουμένη in this verse? Should I read it as passive or middle? How would the meaning of the sentence be changed if it were simply omitted? What is the difference between these two sentences:. Πολὺ ἰσχύει δέησις δικαίου ἐνεργουμένη. Πολὺ ἰσχύει δέησις δικαίου. Ἐξίσταντο δὲ πάντες καὶ διηποροῦντο, ἄλλος πρὸς ἄλλον λέγοντες, τί θέλει τοῦτο εἶναι;.
probible.net
ProBible.net / Romans 10:20
http://probible.net/romans-1020
May 25th, 2013, 11:25 am. Ησαιας δε αποτολμα και λεγει. A) ευρεθην τοις εμε μη ζητουσιν,. B) εμφανης εγενομην τοις εμε μη επερωτωσιν (WH)Rom 10.20:. And Isaiah is even bold enough to say,. A) I was found by those who did not seek me;. B) I became well known to those who did not ask for me. (NET)Rom 10.20 is quoting Isa 65.1, which reads in the NET:65:1. A) I made myself available to those who did not ask for me; 1. B) I appeared to those who did not look for me. 2 (NET)NET footnotes:. Q4 Is this an optio...
