ukhazel.com
data-model – Hazel's 'blog
http://ukhazel.com/wp/tag/data-model
Hazel's 'blog. Musings of a systems engineer. So you miss your DOORS Module Prefix…. In DOORS Classic we have a Module prefix; every requirement (Object) has a number that is unique within the module, and every requirement in a module has the same prefix. The prefix is user defined, and so not guaranteed unique in the database, or even the project, but that is what we are used to, […]. Posted by Hazel Woodcock. Connecting jazz project areas. Posted by Hazel Woodcock. Posted by Hazel Woodcock. The topic o...
ukhazel.com
Documenting Interfaces – Hazel's 'blog
http://ukhazel.com/wp/documenting-interfaces
Hazel's 'blog. Musings of a systems engineer. The need to be sure of giving the same information to both sides of the interface means that we have worked with these separate requirements specs. I see an alternative reality. I can look at the interface requirements and see where they are reused. If an interface requirement is only reused in one place then it isn’t much of an interface! Many interfaces are layered, either using the OSI model. Posted by Hazel Woodcock. Leave a Reply Cancel reply. The postin...
ukhazel.com
ideas – Hazel's 'blog
http://ukhazel.com/wp/category/ideas
Hazel's 'blog. Musings of a systems engineer. So you miss your DOORS Module Prefix…. In DOORS Classic we have a Module prefix; every requirement (Object) has a number that is unique within the module, and every requirement in a module has the same prefix. The prefix is user defined, and so not guaranteed unique in the database, or even the project, but that is what we are used to, […]. Posted by Hazel Woodcock. Connecting jazz project areas. Posted by Hazel Woodcock. Posted by Hazel Woodcock. The topic o...
ukhazel.com
Uncategorized – Hazel's 'blog
http://ukhazel.com/wp/category/uncategorized
Hazel's 'blog. Musings of a systems engineer. Documenting interfaces has always been a challenge. We put the interface requirements in a separate document and give that as a part of the documentation to the groups designing on both sides of the interface. Now I have a single document with all aspects of the interface neatly covered, but when I look at my […]. Posted by Hazel Woodcock. Thinking about workspaces in DOORS Next Gen with CM. Posted by Hazel Woodcock. Documenting a DOORS Database Schema. Enter...
ukhazel.com
Real Configuration Management for Requirements – Hazel's 'blog
http://ukhazel.com/wp/real-cm-for-requirements
Hazel's 'blog. Musings of a systems engineer. Real Configuration Management for Requirements. This is currently Beta code, but available through jazz.net from https:/ jazz.net/downloads/rational-doors-next-generation/betas/5.0CMBeta1. Following the instructions mentioned above, I created a Requirements Management project with CM, and then I got over excited with the options and failed to follow the remainder of the instructions. It all looks interesting, but by that point, I had lost the control and ...
ukhazel.com
test – Hazel's 'blog
http://ukhazel.com/wp/tag/test
Hazel's 'blog. Musings of a systems engineer. Configuring Rational Quality Manager for Simplicity. Rational Quality Manager has a huge number of options. Paring that back to make a simpler tool is possible, and I am going to look here at some of the configuration options. From the Settings menu at the top right, the gear wheel, I will go through some of the important parts of the Project […]. Posted by Hazel Woodcock. Managing test data in DOORS Next Generation. Posted by Hazel Woodcock. Enter your email...
trfeeney.wordpress.com
Tim Feeney | Tim Feeney's Blog on Jazz
https://trfeeney.wordpress.com/author/trfeeney
Tim Feeney's Blog on Jazz. Close encounters of the Jazz kind. Skip to primary content. Skip to secondary content. Author Archives: Tim Feeney. Adopting the IBM Continuous Engineering (CE) solution Configuration Management Capability. October 21, 2016. Adopting the IBM Continuous Engineering (CE) solution Configuration Management Capability is the title of a webinar that Kathryn Fryer. Objectives of the presentation. Trade-offs and considerations as of current release (6.0.2). The slides are shared here.
trfeeney.wordpress.com
Tim Feeney's Blog on Jazz | close encounters of the Jazz kind | Page 2
https://trfeeney.wordpress.com/page/2
Tim Feeney's Blog on Jazz. Close encounters of the Jazz kind. Skip to primary content. Skip to secondary content. Newer posts →. Finding suspect links and requirements to reconcile in CLM 6.0 configuration management enabled projects. June 30, 2015. The newly released CLM 6.0. Has some great configuration management across the lifecycle capabilities. As described in Enabling configuration management in CLM 6.0 applications. The reason being is that in this release, automatic detection of suspect links.
SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT